• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
SRITA

SRITA

Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Ad Collections
    • Cigarettes
    • Pipes & Cigars
    • Chewing
    • Pouches & Gums
    • Marijuana
    • e-Cigarettes
    • Pod e-Cigs
    • Disposable e-Cigs
    • Heated Tobacco
    • Hookah
    • Anti-smoking
    • Comparisons
    • Video Ads
  • Brand Histories
  • Videos & Lectures
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Exhibit
  • About SRITA
    • People
    • Research Interns
    • In the Press
    • Contact Us
Home / Archives for Science

Science

Calms your Nerves – img9725

May 24, 2021 by sutobacco

In a prime example of marketing wizardry, tobacco advertisements have simultaneously presented cigarettes as both sedatives and stimulants. Ads worked to convince consumers that cigarettes would calm the smoker when he felt nervous, or pep him up when he felt sluggish. This theme features ad campaigns from a variety of cigarette brands, all proclaiming cigarettes to be sedatives. Many of the ads in this theme are for Camel cigarettes, and claimed that only Camel cigarettes “do not upset your nerves.” This claim implied that other cigarette brands are stimulants and do cause people to get the jitters, but Camels are the exception. Though Camel was prolific in their anti-nerves campaigns in the 1930s, they were certainly not the only tobacco brand to approach this advertising technique, nor the first.

In 1918, Girard cigars claimed that their cigar “never gets on your nerves,” a slogan which Camel also used over a decade later in 1933. Girard’s ads pose questions that many readers would invariably answer in the affirmative: “Are you easily irritated? Easily annoyed? Do children get on your nerves? Do you fly off the handle and then feel ashamed of yourself?” The ad forces most readers to question their behavior and convinces them that they need intervention, when prior to reading the ad, they felt nothing was wrong. The ad posits Girard as at least one thing that won’t cause anxiety and as the solution to the problems people never even knew they had.

Other ads positioned also their products as relaxing agents. A 1929 ad for Taretyon cigarettes claims that “Tareytons are the choice of busy, active people. People whose work requires steady nerves.” Similarly, many of Camel’s ads explain that people in high pressure situations can’t afford to feel nervous or to have shaky hands (sharpshooters, circus flyers, salesmen, surgeons). The ads don’t provide the reader with the opportunity to think that avoiding cigarettes altogether would be an option if they were worried about the nervous effects of smoking; Instead, Camels are presented as the only “solution” to the nicotine-jolt problem. The ads target a wide variety of audiences, both male and female, young and old, daredevil and housewife. Camel ensures that everyone feels the need for a Camel fix, siting common fidgets like drumming one’s fingers, tapping one’s foot, jingling one’s keys, and even doodling as signs that someone has “jangled nerves.”

Still more brands took the anti-anxiety approach in their ads. In 1933, Lucky Strike advertised that “to anxiety – I bring relief, to distress – I bring courage.” One such ad features a man sitting nervously in the waiting room of a dentist’s office as a woman offers him a Lucky Strike to ease his nerves. Similarly, a 1929 ad for Spud cigarettes poses the question: “Do you smoke away anxiety?” Presuming you answered yes, the ad explains, “then you’ll appreciate Spud’s greater coolness.” The 1938 “Let up – Light up a Camel” campaign explained that “people with work to do break nerve tension” with Camels, and that “smokers find that Camel’s costlier tobaccos are soothing to the nerves!” Even 20 years later, in 1959, King Sano cigars advertised that “the man under pressure owes himself the utter luxury of the new ‘soft smoke’ King Sano.”

Also of note, many of these ads claim that Camels provide their smokers with “healthy nerves,” misleadingly implying that Camel cigarettes themselves are healthy.

Tobacco “Science” – img12383

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12384

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12385

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12386

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12387

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12388

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Protects Your Health – img2001

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

This theme features a variety of ads professing health benefits for filter cigarettes, although filters did little to truly reduce the hazards of smoking. Indeed, tobacco industry chemists were well aware that most filters actually removed no more tar and nicotine than would the same length of tobacco. However, a series of Reader’s Digest articles worked to publicize these dubious health claims for filters in the 1950s.

One such article, entitled “How Harmful are Cigarettes?” (1950), notes that artificial filters “take out some nicotine” since people are “aware that nicotine is a killer” (1). The article states that silica-gel cartridges remove 60% of nicotine from cigarettes. This article spurred Viceroy to print advertisements a week later which read, “Reader's Digest tells why filtered cigarette smoke is better for your health.” These health claims sparked a boom in Viceroy cigarette sales as well as an onslaught of new filter cigarette brands flooding the market. Kent was introduced in 1952 with a filter made of treated asbestos on crepe paper. In 1953, L&M followed with a “miracle tip” and Philip Morris advertised its di-ethylene glycol (Di-Gl) filter cigarette as “the cigarette that takes the FEAR out of smoking.” In the next two years, Marlboro was re-released as a filter cigarette which targeted men (it had previously been a cigarette targeting women, with a “beauty tip to protect the lips”), and Winston was introduced with a hefty advertising budget of $15 million.

Leading the pack with health claims was Kent, with ads that read, “What a wonderful feeling to know that Kent filters best of all leading filter cigarettes!” (1958) and “You’ll feel better about smoking with the taste of Kent!” (1961). Ironically, Kent’s filter contained asbestos, a mineral known to cause mesothelioma, a fatal form of cancer. In fact, the asbestos in Kent’s filter was crocidolite asbestos (also known as blue asbestos), which is often considered the deadliest form of the fibrous mineral.

1. Riis, R.W. Reader’s Digest. “How Harmful are Cigarettes?” 7 Jan 1999. .

Tobacco “Science” – img12381

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12389

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12390

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12391

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12392

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12393

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12394

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12395

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12396

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12397

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Early Black Ads – img10976

May 25, 2021 by sutobacco

As World War II came to a close, tobacco companies needed to expand to “new” markets in order to maintain prosperity. At this point, they began issuing mass marketing efforts targeting African Americans. Whereas there was minor advertising in weekly African Americans newspapers prior to the war, scholars cite a number of post-war changes as the sources for the surge in market expansion, mainly the growth in urban migration and the steadily increasing incomes of African Americans in the 1940s (1). One scholar explains that “between 1920 and 1943, the annual income of African Americans increased threefold, from $3 billion to more than $10 billion,” making the population an increasingly appealing demographic for the tobacco industry (2). Indeed, advertising and marketing magazines published many articles at the time describing the profitable “emerging Negro market.” One such article from 1944, for example, was titled, “The American Negro—An ‘Export’ Market at Home” (3). A subsequent article printed a year later provided a table depicting “How Negroes Spent Their Incomes, 1920-1943 (4). The table revealed that the amount of money African Americans spent on tobacco products increased six-fold from 1920 to 1943.

Perhaps the catalyzing force in the tobacco industry’s foray into African American targeting came in the form of emerging advertising avenues that could be used to target African American populations without alienating whites; the 1940s saw the introduction of a number of glossy monthly magazines including Negro Digest (1942, renamed Black World), Ebony (1945) and Negro Achievements (1947, renamed Sepia). These mass-media publications were much more attractive to advertisers than the African American daily newspapers of the pre-war era, with glossy pages and a larger national distribution. The magazines, because they were intended for a purely African American audience, also provided advertisers with an opportunity to run ads featuring African American models away from the eyes of white consumers.

Internal tobacco industry documents reveal the massive development of the African American market in the 1940s and its impact on the tobacco industry. Public Relations firms specializing in targeting African American populations sent materials to the major tobacco companies hoping to secure business partnerships. One PR firm, in correspondence with RJ Reynolds in 1949, reminded the company that, “The negro market is a big one. I sincerely hope that I may have the opportunity [sic] of helping to further cultivate it for you” (5).

The major tobacco companies all made inroads on the “Negro market” in the ‘40s and ‘50s. Indeed, before the invent of such avenues, in the first decades of the twentieth century, the only ads featuring African Americans were racist advertisements using black caricatures, a striking contrast to the depictions seen in African American publications from the late 1940s to early 1950s, which featured African American models as professionals, students, and famous athletes. An advertising trade magazine, Printer’s Ink, described how, in 1947, the American Tobacco Company “entered the Negro market with a series of Famous Firsts about Negroes that were eye-openers to many in advertising” (6). The article describes the campaign content as telling “the history of some of the outstanding achievements of the Negroes,” most of which, according to the article, “were little known to students of the race.” Examples of these spotlights included Dr. Daniel Hale Williams, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver, and “some of the modern Negro notables.” The Printer’s Ink article explains that the campaign intends to market cigarettes to African Americans by demonstrating “to the Negro that his race has accomplished many things.”

Tobacco advertising methods targeting African Americans shifted in the late 1950s, 60s, and 70s with the rise of the Civil Rights movement, and just as there was economic and market pressure in the 1940s to increase marketing efforts to African Americans, the 1970s and 1980s sparked resurgence in these efforts. An R.J. Reynolds document from 1969, for example, marks an increase in “Negro purchasing power” from 3 billion in 1940 to 32 billion in 1970. At this point, in order to refocus attention on the African American population and strengthen their ties to the community, tobacco companies worked on promotional campaigns, which funded key organizations such as the NAACP, the National Urban League, and the United Negro College Fund. An internal Brown & Williamson document declares that the “relatively small and often tight knit community can work to B&W’s marketing advantage if exploited properly. Peer pressure plays a more important role in many phases of life in the minority community. Therefore, dominance of the market place and the community environment is necessary to successfully increase sales there” (7).

As the industry began sponsoring African American institutions and charities, they also shifted their print advertising techniques to reflect the changing political climate. Increasingly, models wearing “naturals” or Afros began popping up in ads for Newport, L&M, Kent, Kool, and many more. A Kent ad from 1971 shows a man and a woman, both wearing Afros, talking on the phone together and smoking cigarettes, the slogan “Rap’n Kent” underneath.

One scholar describes advertisements from the early 1960s as portraying a “racially desegregated society in which the discerning tastes and values of black consumers were highlighted” (3). But she notes a shift with the emergence of Black Power, in which ads were able to latch onto the Black Nationalism movement while completely avoiding the political ideology therein. Instead, the ads worked at “selling soul,” and “invoked themes of black pride, solidarity, and “soul style.” Indeed, a Viceroy ad campaign from 1970 demonstrates a carefully crafted combination of both approaches. One ad from the campaign shows a stylish couple – the man in a suit and the woman in a yellow mod mini-dress – shopping at an outdoor art boutique while smoking. The caption reads, “Their collection? It’s fun to build on. Their apartment looks like a gallery. With everything from Neo-Afro realism to their child’s finger painting. Their cigarettes? Viceroy. They won’t settle for anything less. It’s a matter of taste.” This ad exemplifies the industry’s blatant attempts at exploiting Black Nationalism. An internal Brown & Williamson document from 1969 reveals that tobacco companies were indeed using this theme to market cigarettes: “The desire for blackness, or soul, as part of solving their identity crisis is something that must be understood. A sense of identity is being accentuated because today, as never before, Negroes are taking pride in themselves” (8). Viceroy, like many of the other leading brands, also capitalized on this “soul” movement. Another ad from the same series features four African Americans at a nightclub enjoying drinks and cigarettes while listening to a musician. White people sit in the background enjoying the same music. The caption for this ad reads, “Their sounds? They like ‘em heavy. And with soul. The music not only has to say something. It has to move.”

At this time, menthols also emerged as a cigarette targeting African-Americans. Whereas in the past, menthol cigarettes had been advertised to the general population as an occasional cigarette to smoke when sick or suffering from smoker’s cough, the 1960s brought along the beginnings of a different image for the menthol cigarette. In 1969 alone, Lorillard increased its “Negro market budget” by 87% over 1968 due to the introduction of its menthol cigarette, Newport, to the African American market. Likewise, British American Tobacco doubled their budget from 1968 to 1969 in order to increase African-American radio station coverage for its menthol cigarette, Kool, as well as for Viceroy, which targeted African American stations (8). Today, over 70% of African-American smokers smoke menthols as opposed to only 35% of white smokers (9).

1. Walker, Susannah. “Black Dollar Power:” Susannah Walker. (University of Chicago Press, Jul 15, 2009 )

2. Walker, Susannah. “Style & Status: Selling Beauty to African American Women, 1920-1975”

3. Sullivan, David J. “The American Negro—An ‘Export’ Market at Home!” Printer’s Ink; 208:3. 21 July 1944:90.

4 Sullivan, David J. “How Negroes Spent Their Incomes, 1920-1943.” Sales Management. 15 June 1945.

5. “Thank You Very Much For Your Letter of the 23rd.” RJ Reynolds. 31 March 1949. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/bwz79d00

6. “—No Title—.” American Tobacco. 26 Nov 1948. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/vaj41a00

7. “Discussion Paper: Total Minority Marketing Plan,” 7 Sept 1984. Http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/dmf41f00

8. “A Study of Ethnic Markets.” R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Sept 1969. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/paq76b00

9. Gardiner, Phillip S. “The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research Vol.6 Supp. 1. Feb 2004.

Tobacco “Science” – img12398

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12399

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12400

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12401

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12402

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12403

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12404

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12405

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12406

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12407

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12408

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12409

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12410

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12411

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12412

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12413

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12414

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12415

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12416

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12417

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12418

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12419

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12421

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12422

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12423

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12424

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12425

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12426

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12427

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12428

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12429

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12430

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12431

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12432

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12433

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12434

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12435

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12436

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img12437

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13574

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13575

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13576

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13577

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13578

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13579

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13580

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13581

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13582

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13583

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13584

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13585

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13586

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13587

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13588

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13589

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13590

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13591

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13592

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13593

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13594

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13595

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13596

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13616

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13597

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13598

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13599

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13600

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13601

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13602

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13603

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13604

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13605

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13606

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13607

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13617

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13608

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13609

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13618

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13610

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13611

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

Tobacco “Science” – img13612

May 19, 2021 by sutobacco

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About SRITA

SRITA’s repository of tobacco advertising supports scholarly research and public inquiry into the promotional activities of the tobacco industry. Learn more

Explore SRITA

  • Ad Collections
  • Video Ads
  • Brand Histories
  • Lectures
  • Publications
  • Resources

Copyright © 2026 · Stanford University